These two maps make interesting comparisons as it they show the
contrast between the 18th
century impressionism for landscape by using lumps to indicate hills,
and a
fairly soft touch to the road lines - as opposed to the very sharp
defined lines of
the 19th century mapmakers.
The
first map is kindly loaned by Peter Walker, whose particular hobby is
studying and collecting old maps of Essex.
This map shows the old Hundreds of Uttlesford, Clavering and Freshwell
as used in the Philip Morant History of Essex, and was created by
Emanuel Bowen in 1768.The map
was dedicated to Sir John Griffin Griffin of Audley End House.
The
second map is extracted from Thomas Wright’s A
History and Topography of the County of Essex published in
two volumes
in 1836. This shows most of the area now covered by the Recorders of
Uttlesford. The modern
district of Uttlesford did not, of course, exist then, so the divisions
shown are
the old hundred boundaries which are not respected by the modern
Uttlesford boundary,
which today covers parts of several hundreds.
Thomas
Wright (1810-77) was an undergraduate at Cambridge
when he was commissioned by George Virtue to edit and write a history
of Essex.
It is thought that he actually only visited the county twice!
Nevertheless, according to a present-day historian Ken Neale, Wright
‘produced a highly literate, reliable and substantial
two-volume account’. To some extent it is a re-hash of Philip
Morant’s more famous History
of
Essex but, as Ken Neale says, ‘it was uncommonly
well done, stands the test of time and is much more affordable than the
now extremely valuable Morant
originals’ (references from ‘Historians of
Essex’ by Kenneth
Neale, Saffron Walden Historical Journal,
No 12 (Autumn 2006), p6).
On
the 18th century map, the words Magna and Parva
are used instead of Great and Little as applied to Chesterford, etc and
various spellings are different, eg Duddenhoe End is Dudney End, Wenden Lofts is Wenden
Loughts. There are interesting features shown, such as St Leonard’s
Hospital at Newport, a number of windmills and the old deer parks at
Little Walden and Langley. On the 19th century
map, too, spellings
were different – WickhamBonant is now Wicken Bonhunt, Berdon
is now
Berden, Manewden is now Manuden, the Roothings (the southern limit of
modern Uttlesford) are now the Rodings. On both maps, some places such
as Haydon (now spelt Heydon) and Great Chishill are no longer in Essex,
but in Cambridgeshire.
Peter Walker considers
that the 1768 map, created by Bingley, is reasonably
accurate - everything that tried to show detail after Chapman &
Andre of
1773 generally is good. Bingley was making use of the Ordnance Survey
by then, and the OS
made use of the Chapman & Andre.The Bowen map was
made before Chapman & Andre, but uses a map of 1724 by
Warburton which is very good – Warburton’s was the
first detailed accurate map of Essex, and Bowen used that in the Large
English Atlas,
which was used by C&A which was used by the OS, etc.
This
copy of the map is in much better condition than the one held by the
ERO, so we are very
grateful for Peter Walker for sharing it with the Recorder’s
website.
Please remember to acknowledge the source when using the map.
Jacqueline Cooper
|
Map of Uttlesford taken from Camden's Britannia of 1722
Map historian Peter Walker tells us that this map dated
1722 is taken from Camden's Britannia, which was first published in 1586, and
from 1607 it contained county maps (based on Saxton). The book was re-published
in several editions over 200 years, the last one being in 1806. A major new
edition with text by Gibson was published in 1695 used maps from Robert Morden,
and these continued to be used in the re-issues of 1722, 30, 53 and 72; the
Morden maps were not replaced until the Cary maps in 1789.
The map of Essex was based on Ogilby & Morgan's 1678
map, and was essentially unchanged in the later editions. It includes roads -
albeit a bit schematically in places - and has most of the major features in the
right places relative to each other. There are lines of longitude, using St
Paul's London as the prime meridian, and three scales - of great, middle and
small miles (the last being approx 1,760 yards). As such it is an improvement
over the Saxton and Saxton-derived maps of the preceding 100 years, but is not
very neatly drawn, nor is it very attractive compared to those being produced in
the Netherlands. It would be superseded for accuracy and design in the 18th
century by the Warburton map, which formed the basis of maps for the rest of
that century.
|