The History Of
Great Sampford and Little Sampford
click on image to enlarge
The
contrasting villages of Great and Little Sampford have a
long history. Finds of worked flints at Great Sampford suggest a
Neolithic site
of some importance, scattered Bronze Age finds have been recovered and
ditches
probably associated with an Iron Age farmstead have been excavated.In
both parishes Roman
sites have been
discovered, of buildings with heating systems and heavy tile roofs but
considerably smaller than villas. These fit with the emerging picture
of the
Roman countryside being peppered with smaller farmsteads between the
great
estates of the villas. The river Pant runs through both parishes, and
its name
is a survival from the ancient brythonic tongue spoken before the
Romans
arrived that eventually became modern Welsh.
Essex was one of the earliest Saxon kingdoms and
this survival suggests
some kind of contact allowing linguistic exchange between the resident
Celts
and incoming Saxons.
Physical
signs of the Anglo-Saxons are hard to come by, though a few artefacts
have been
found in the fields.Interestingly,
however, the Freshwell Hundred (the local administrative district,
which in
some respects survived as such into the nineteenth century) which the
Sampfords
belong to is a late Anglo-Saxon creation.
Domesday records two manors held in the reign of
Edward by Wihtgar and
Eadgifu the Fair, suggesting that there were already two settlements.
One was
named as Sanfort, the other Sanforda – both probably
representing a
French-speaking clerk’s attempt to render in Latin the Old
English San Forda
or sandy ford – one of which survives in Great Sampford, and
is still
sandy-bottomed.
Both
villages are sited in Rackham’s “Ancient
Countryside”. Despitethe
loss of many hedges in the late 20th
Century, many of those that survive are sinuous with relict plants of
ancient
woodland such as dog’s mercury and wood anemone amongst their
roots, suggesting
that they are many centuries old.
In
fact the late John Hunter’s study suggested that most of the
medieval landscape
survived into the 1950s! The boundaries of the two parishes entwine
through
this and, until they were “tidied” in the
nineteenth century, each contained
detached enclaves of the other. These entangled boundaries and detached
portions suggest “intercommoning”, where residents
of both settlements had
rights to common land between them, and the boundaries of became fixed
around
these people’s plots when the parish boundaries coalesced,
probably in the 12th
century. At some time around this period, what is now Great Sampford
appears to
have been laid out according to a rectangular plan with the manor house
at one
corner, and the church across the road from the manor. This layout can
still be
seen today, despite one side of the rectangle never being developed,
and despite
later encroachments across the centre line of the plot. On the other
hand,
Little Sampford remained a series of straggling hamlets and the church
and
probable manor site, although adjacent to each other, at some distance
from the
nearest settlement.
In 1096
William Rufus granted the church of St Michael at Sampford Magna (now
Great
Sampford) to Battle Abbey, and it was to become the seat of a Rural
Deanery,
covering twenty-one parishes. This importance, and the wealth of the
abbey, explains
the enormous church in such a small village. Apart from the
thirteenth-century
south transept almost the entire structure dates to between 1320 and
1350. Almost
no addition was made to the church after this date. Battle Abbey had
long since
stopped maintaining it by the Dissolution and the neglect continued so
long
that, even after Victorian refurbishments in the 1840s and 1870s, the
parish
was unable to roof the nave in anything better than corrugated iron. St
Mary’s
at Little Sampford, on the other hand, appears to have evolved
piecemeal over
the centuries. One notable break in construction can be seen in the
mid-fourteenth century tower, which is popularly attributed to the
Black Death.
Here the living was attached to the manor, rather than a distant abbey,
which
may explain the continued development of the building.
There are
other medieval relics as well.A
number
of farms retain the names of their owners, with Free Roberts bearing a
name
recorded in 1258, whilst the record-holder in Little Sampford is
Hawkes, first
recorded in 1280. There are also a number of moats, sites
of moats, within the two parishes. Some
of these, such as at Howses, still enclose a house whilst others do
not. Most
are thought to be of 13th or 14th
century date, and would
probably have been dug for display, and to supply fresh fish, rather
than for
defence.They
suggest prosperous
settlers, able to expend money on building status symbols. A second
wave of
moat digging occurred in Tudor times as arrivistes sought to give their
new homes
a respectable air of antiquity by surrounding them in medieval fashion.
At
around this time a deer park was created at Little Sampford and a
mansion built
in brick. The park has reverted to arable land and the house was pulled
down in
the 1920s but the outline of the park can still be traced and many
features of
the ornamental garden survive in the grounds of the
“new” Little Sampford
Hall.
Several
houses survive that predate the Tudor hall, in both parishes. A
sprinkling of
sixteenth century houses and a plethora of seventeenth and eighteenth
century
ones demonstrate the relative prosperity of these centuries, when the
Sampfords
were weaving villages. Ironically they also show the poverty of later
times,
when there was not the money available to pull down and replace with
the latest
style.
A number of
“personalities” passed through the 17th
and 18th century Sampfords.
Colonel Jonas Watson, Chief Bombardier of England, is commemorated by
an
obelisk in Great Sampford churchyard, killed on active service aged 77,
whilst James
MacAdam, son of the inventor of tarmac,
and Arthur Young, famed writer on agricultural matters and multiple
failure as
a farmer, both lived at Little Sampford Hall. The most lasting legacy
of these
landlords are the churchyard wall and lime trees at Great Sampford,
planted by
General Eustace who, having carried a silver plate in his skull since
the
Peninsular War, in later years insisted on riding his horse up the
stairs to
bed each evening! Elsewhere, Henry Hebblethwaite inoculated parish
children against
the pox, and may well have spent time in the West Indies for his
brother’s
children (by a slave mother) sued for a share in his estate.
If the population is anything
to go by, the Sampfords were
relatively prosperous in the early nineteenth century. In 1801 Great
and Little
Sampford had 597 and 346 inhabitants respectively. By 1851 the figures
were 906
and 471. In the centre of Great Sampford, the Red Lion Inn was built
around
1830, and suggests that someone had plenty of money to erect such a
fine brick
building. However the figures oscillated through the later nineteenth
century
as agricultural depression bit and in 1901 the population was 496 and
296, with
many people leaving for the towns, especially London, as the ease of
travel
increased. In 1875 the School Board had to defend themselves against an
accusation that they had over-estimated the number of pupils they had
to
provide for by pointing out that a mass exodus had left twenty cottages
uninhabited. Here was no rustic idyll. The 1871 census recorded 9
people living
in sheds, and disease was rife with cholera striking in 1866 and
typhoid
several times in the 1870s. Improvements were being made, however. A
school was
built in 1870 and, for reasons of politics, was replaced by the current
building in 1878. At long last Sampford children were to experience the
benefits of universal education.A
fine
new Baptist Chapel was also built at much the same time, in the midst
of the
depression and exodus.
It was two denuded
villages that greeted the 20th century.
Of 285 houses in the Sampfords in 1851, only 184
were inhabited seventy
years later. On the other hand, despite general depression agricultural
labourers were doing well. So many had left for employment in the
cities that
those who were left could name their wage, and many were able to take
up small
farms as a result. However 1914 bought war on an unprecedented scale.
The two
parishes record 26 names on their war memorials and many more must have
served.
Sidney Gowlett returned home with a Distinguished Conduct Medal and
Walter
Schwier with the Military Cross, the latter having taken part in a
cavalry
charge in 1917. The schoolmaster Harold Blayney, feared and respected
in equal
parts by the pupils he thrashed, inspired similar fear in recruits
before
making his way to Palestine in time to witness the collapse of the
Turkish
army, while brothers Jim and Bill Gray tired of waiting to be liberated
from
POW camp whilst Germany crumbled round them and simply made their own
way home.
Although
some new houses were built along the Thaxted road in the 1920s, they
did not
return home to a land fit for heroes. Agriculture had prospered during
the war,
with cheap grain from North America restricted by U-boats. But prices
crashed
in 1921 and farming entered a deep slump that it would not recover from
for
nearly twenty years. The 1920s and ‘30s were characterised by
poverty and
struggle, with peopling leaving the village. In 1936 Jim Gray was
offered £100
or a cottage in his uncle’s will, and took the money because
he would not have
to pay for its upkeep! Tithe was seen as an iniquitous tax, and at
least three
Sampford farmers took extreme measures, having to be prosecuted before
they
would pay. It was also at this time that the middle-class
“invasion”
of the countryside began. Gerald
Miller became the first commuter, writing a column on rural matters for
the
Times, and artists and intellectuals such as Olga Lehmann and Alan
Rawsthorne moved
in. Holidays in Great Sampford even inspired the Reverend Graves to
found the
legendary Dagenham Girl Pipers!Agricultural
subsidies began to effect a recovery in the late 1930s, and much work
was done
to shore up the crumbling fabric of Great Sampford church in 1937.At
this point the Tudor
stair that English
Heritage insist to this day is still there was removed from the tower.
However war
once again reared its ugly head. On September 2nd
1939, 150 women
and children were evacuated to the Sampfords from London. Many soon
returned,
but a number of city children spent several years there.Given that the
children
were supposedly
evacuated to “safety”, it is sobering to think that
farmers were given
instructions on how to destroy anything of value to the enemy, and at
least one
family kept their suitcases packed in the hallway.
In fact, one of the “Stop Lines”
– rows of
fortifications that were supposed to delay the progress of the Nazi
invaders -
defending London passed right through the Sampfords!
This was manned by the local Home Guard –
eventually, for the building chosen for their command post could not be
used
until the shopkeeper’s hen had hatched the brood it was
incubating there!Some
200 bombs fell in the villages, including
at least two huge parachute mines, and on August 26th
two German
airmen, parachuting from their burning bomber after a raid on RAF
Debden,
landed at Great Sampford where they were captured. They fared better
than a
squadron-mate who, landing at nearby Finchingfield, broke his leg when
he hit
the war memorial! Later that year, construction began on an airfield
called RAF
Great Sampford, but in fact lying almost entirely within the parish of
Radwinter.Perhaps
the oddest legacy of
the war was, for many years, a hymn in “Ancient and
Modern” to the tune
“Sampford”, the work of John Ireland who spent the
war years at Little Sampford
rectory.
Thankfully
the invasion never came.After
the war
agriculture remained profitable, and the village seemed to be
thriving.However, as economics
became more and more
important, and as mechanisation progressed, the number of men employed
on the
land became fewer and fewer. Larger
and
larger machinery came in to try to speed harvest, and to have grain to
sell
before the market was glutted and the price collapsed as it does each
harvest.As a
result fields were amalgamated and
hedges grubbed out, making a substantially more open landscape than had
been
the case previously.There
was also less
employment in the village, so people moved away into towns.
Meanwhile
the population of Britain was becoming increasingly middle-class, and
affluent
enough to afford the urban ideal of a house in the country.As a result
of this
cross-traffic, the
Sampfords have increasingly become dormitory villages for commuters.The
rise of supermarkets
has meant that
shops, pubs, and a village garage have closed, leaving a single pub and
a
garage in Great Sampford as the only local
“necessities”.There is little employment in the
village
itself and, ironically, the airport that threatens the area is probably
the
biggest employer of Sampford people.House
prices continue to reinforce the middle-class nature –
remember the £100
cottage in 1936? They have increased by thousands of percent since!
– and few
young people growing up in the Sampfords are likely to be able to
afford to buy
a house there.However, the picture is
not all doom-and-gloom. The two
village cricket clubs merged in the 1970s and Sampfords Cricket Club
have
recently purchased the ground they have played on since then.There is
also a Sampfords
Society who have
been very active in Local History, and who were involved in Heritage
Sampford,
an ambitiousproject
to map the
archaeology of both parishes. This has provided much of the historical
information
here.
Adrian Gray
|